Blog Layout

Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr.

Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr.

Case Name

Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr.

Type of Injury

DISLOCATION FRACTURE OF THE CERVICAL SPINE

Occupation

landscaper

Location

Suffolk, NY

Verdict

$610,164, plus interest (5/1).

Verdict Amount

$610,164.00

Case Details

XIV/47-15 MOTOR VEHICLE PASSENGER DISLOCATION FRACTURE OF THE CERVICAL SPINE SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY

Anthony D Agostino v. Richard Paty, Jr. and Richard Paty, Sr. 23607/93 8-day trial Verdict 4/16/97 Judge Peter Fox Cohalan, Suffolk Supreme

VERDICT: $610,164, plus interest (5/1). Breakdown: $325,000 for past pain and suffering; $42,745 for past medical expenses; $51, 384 for past lost earnings; $175,000 for future pain and suffering; $ 16,035 for future lost earnings. Jury: 4 male, 2 female.

Pltf. Atty: Michael Carner of Sarisohn, Sarisohn, Carner, LeBow, Braun & Castrovinci, Commack

Deft. Atty: Marcy D. Sheinwold of Lewis, Johs, Avallone, Aviles & Kaufman, Melville

Facts: Pltf., a 38-year-old landscaper, testified that on 8/30/93 shortly after 12 AM he was a passenger in a car driven by Deft. Paty, Jr. He claimed that they were traveling on Harned Rd. in Commack when the car suddenly left the road and hit a tree and utility pole. Pltf. was granted summary judgment on liability in September 1995 and this trial was on damages only.

Injuries: hangman s fracture dislocation at C2-3 ultimately resulting in a spontaneous spinal fusion at C1, 2, and 3. He wore a halo brace for 10 weeks. Pltf. claimed that he has severe permanent restriction of motion in the neck. He received physical therapy and acupuncture treatment. Pltf. testified that he cannot return to work as a landscaper and that he cannot perform sedentary work. He also testified that he has not driven a car since the accident. Pltf. s economist testified that his future lost earnings would be approximately $750,000. Deft. denied that there was a spinal fusion at C1-2 and contended that the restriction of motion was not as severe as Pltf. claimed. Deft. contended that Pltf. only had a mild to moderate disability, and that he was employable in a variety of sedentary jobs.

Demonstrative evidence: X-rays; 3-D CAT scan reconstruction; MRI films; hospital records; physical therapy and acupuncture records; model and computer-generated diagrams of the spine. Specials: $42, 745 for medical expenses; $51,384 for lost earnings. Final offer: $ 750,000; demand: $950,000. Jury deliberation: 4 hours. Carrier: Allstate. Pltf. Experts: Dr. Allen Zippin, neurosurgeon, Smithtown; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Alan Leiken, Ph.D., economist, Stony Brook. Deft. Experts: Dr. James Sarno, neurosurgeon, Hempstead; Morris Ehrenreich, Ph.D., vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Dr. John Killian, orth. surg., Hempstead.

RECENT POSTS

Medical Malpractice
22 Apr, 2024
Discover the causes, implications, and legal remedies in medical malpractice cases. Expert insights on this crucial topic.
Nurses in Life Care Planning
18 Apr, 2024
Learn why nurses are essential in life care planning. Explore their impact on personalized, effective care strategies
 Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
08 Apr, 2024
With Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a significant settlement can reduce your monthly benefits or disqualify you from the program.
Vocational Experts in Product Liability Cases
01 Apr, 2024
Product liability cases can be tough, requiring the assistance of various experts in addition to a legal team.
Medicaid Long Term Care Explained
25 Mar, 2024
Medicaid Long Term Care includes various programs that can help financially challenged seniors receive the care they need.

CONTACT US

Share by: