Blog Layout

Diane (Cestra) Parmentier, indiv. and as m/n/g of Monique Parmentier, inf. f/k/a Monique Cestra, inf. under the age of 14 v. Dr. Richard Hill

Diane (Cestra) Parmentier, indiv. and as m/n/g of Monique Parmentier, inf. f/k/a Monique Cestra, inf. under the age of 14 v. Dr. Richard Hill

Case Name

Diane (Cestra) Parmentier, indiv. and as m/n/g of Monique Parmentier, inf. f/k/a Monique Cestra, inf. under the age of 14 v. Dr. Richard Hill

Type of Injury

BRAIN DAMAGE

Location

Suffolk, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict for all Defts. (6/0)

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

IX/44-11 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE FAILURE TO TIMELY DIAGNOSE RARE FORM OF MENINGITIS BRAIN DAMAGE DEFENSE VERDICT

Diane (Cestra) Parmentier, indiv. and as m/n/g of Monique Parmentier, inf. f/k/a Monique Cestra, inf. under the age of 14 v. Dr. Richard Hill, Dr. R. Joel Perkerson, Dr. Saul Blecher, Dr. Joseph LoVece, and Southside Hospital 83/010566 2-month trial Verdict 3/13/92 Judge Patrick Henry, Suffolk Supreme

VERDICT: Defense verdict for all Defts. (6/0). Jury: 2 male, 4 female. Notice of Appeal by Pltf. is likely.

Pltf. Atty: William A. Wismann and David C. Weisberg of Davidow, Davidow & Wismann, Patchogue

Deft. Atty: Robert W. DeVerna of Wortman, Fumuso, Kelly, DeVerna & Snyder, Hauppauge, for Hill and LoVece

Richard C. Mooney of Rivkin, Radler, Bayh, Hart & Kremer, Uniondale, for Perkerson

William G. Spratt of Bower & Gardner, Manhattan, for Blecher and Southside

Facts: On 11/8/80, the 10-week-old Pltf. and her two older sisters, ages 2 and 4, were brought to Deft. Dr. Hill’s office suffering from intestinal symptoms. Pltf. was feverish, lethargic, and irritable, and had vomited the night before. She was admitted to Deft. Southside Hospital for observation. Defts. Perkerson and Blecher, residents in the hospital, performed a spinal tap 15 hours later after consulting with the attending physician. The tap was positive for meningitis. Pltf. was treated with Chloramphenicol and Ampicillin with a presumptive diagnosis of H flu meningitis. Further tests revealed the existence of Salmonella B meningitis, a rare type of the disease. Pltf. became very lethargic and began experiencing seizures. She was intubated and transferred to North Shore University Hospital where she remained from 11/9/80 through 1/21/81. During that time, she experienced several relapses.

Injuries: brain damage resulting in mental retardation. The child also has a congenital malocclusion, and Pltf.’s treating orthodontist testified that it will be difficult to treat the overbite because the child will not wear braces or a dental retainer. Pltf., age 12 at the time of trial, functions on a first grade level. She is enrolled in an alternative learning class. Pltf. contended that the child will be unable to work or care for herself. Pltf. also contended that the child will require institutionalization at a special school from age 21 to 31 and then in an intermediate care facility, followed by possible group home living. Defts. claimed that Pltf. will be able to perform in a group home with vocational training for a sheltered workshop or supportive employment.

Pltf. contended that if Defts. had performed the lumbar puncture sooner, the meningitis would have been diagnosed and the infant cured. Pltf. also contended that Deft.’s nursing staff negligently failed to properly monitor the child and report changes in her clinical condition to the residents and attending doctor.

Defts. contended that they used appropriate judgment in making their presumptive diagnosis of a viral infection based on the symptoms and clinical presentation of Pltf.’s sisters. It was later noted that Pltf.’s sisters both had positive stool cultures for Salmonella B meningitis. Defts. also contended that lumbar punctures should not be performed indiscriminately. Defts. also contended that in view of the child’s lengthy clinical course and hospital stay, treatment 15 hours earlier would not have made a difference in her final condition. They also contended that Chloramphenicol and Ampicillin, the antibiotics available at that time, were not effective against Salmonella B meningitis. Offer: structured settlement with a present cost of $700,000; demand: $4,000,000; amount asked of jury: $10,000,000.

Pltf. Experts: Dr. Hugh Evans, neonatologist and infectious diseases, New Jersey School of Medicine, Newark, New Jersey; Dr. Leonard Graziani, pediatric neurologist, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Dr. Steven Bisbing, forensic psychologist, Tacoma Park, Maryland; Dr. Stanley Gould, pediatrician, Woods School, Langhorne, Pennsylvania; Katherine Piggott, nursing expert, Seattle, Washington; Dr. Edward O’Shea, treating orthodontist, Port Jefferson; Dr. Frederic Levine, treating psychologist, Port Jefferson; Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational expert, Manhattan; Dr. Alfred Spieler, pediatrician, Patchogue; Dr. Helen Emmerich, school psychologist, Three Village School System; Dr. Jeffrey Pomerantz, school psychologist, Three Village School System; Dr. Albert Levenson, economist, Woodmere. Deft. Experts: Dr. Abe Chutorian, pediatric neurologist, Manhattan; Dr. Joyce Spinello, vocational expert, Manhattan; Dr. Mark Kaplan, Pltf.’s treating physician, infectious diseases (by subpoena), Manhasset.

RECENT POSTS

What Is Court Testimony
18 Mar, 2024
The question of what is court testimony can be confusing for those who aren’t legal professionals, primarily due to the fact witnesses fall into two distinct categories.
What Is Demonstrative Evidence In A Personal Injury Case
11 Mar, 2024
Demonstrative evidence can clarify the facts of the case and convince a jury of your claims.
Loss Of Earning Capacity
04 Mar, 2024
Loss of earning capacity can be awarded in a personal injury case and may help you recover financially after suffering an injury.
VA Disability Increase 2024
26 Feb, 2024
The VA disability increase 2024 is a good measure to fight inflation that may not be enough to account for the needs of all veterans.
Social Security Disability Claim
19 Feb, 2024
Many people who received workers comp also ask the question “Can I get disability after workers’ comp settlement”. The answer is yes, but it can be challenging.

CONTACT US

Share by: