Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York

Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York

Case Name

Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York

Type of Injury

HERNIATED DISC

Occupation

new york city police officer

Location

New York, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict.

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

IV/6-83 JONES ACT – HARBOR PATROL POLICE OFFICER FALLS ON GANGWAY – HERNIATED DISC

Fred and Mary Olsen v. City of New York 83 Civ 0462 5-day trial Verdict 3/19/85 Judge Constance Baker Motley, Southern District

VERDICT: Defense verdict.

Pltf. Atty: Stanley F. Meltzer of Meltzer & Fishman, Manhattan

Deft. Atty: Vito A. Cannavo, Asst. Corp. Counsel

Facts: Pltf. was a 31-year-old New York City police officer assigned to the Harbor Unit of the police department. He claimed that on 12/2/81, he slipped and fell on a gangway while entering a police harbor boat. Pltf. brought this action under the Jones Act, claiming that the surface of the ramp was not skid-resistant. Pltf. also alleged that the gangway was set at too steep an angle (35G). Pltf. called several other police officers as eyewitnesses. They also testified that they had complained about the condition of the gangway to their superiors before the accident. Deft. contended that there was insufficient proof that the accident occurred at the time and place that Pltf. alleged. In addition, Deft. argued that if the accident occurred as Pltf. described, he was contributorily negligent in failing to use an available handrail and in not wearing nonskid deck shoes. In response, Pltf. argued that he was not allowed to wear deck shoes. Deft. also called the sergeant who supervised Pltf. He testified that no complaints regarding the condition of the gangway were made to him. Injuries: herniated discs at L-4, L-5 and L-5, S-1 (confirmed by CAT scan). Pltf. retired from the police department on disability. An economist testified that Pltf.’s lost earnings amounted to $ 600,000. Deft. called a neurologist who testified that Pltf.’s back injuries were apparently preexisting. Amount asked of jury: $2,500,000. Pltf. Experts: Howard Silfin, engineer; Herbert Stillwaggon, maritime expert; Irwin Stricker, economist; Dr. Edmond Prouder, rehabilitative medicine; Dr. Mark Kashen, radiologist, Great Neck; Dr. Gary Korenman, neurologist, Manhattan; Dr. Stephen Zolan, orth. surg., Hicksville. Deft. Expert: Dr. Murray Budabin, neurologist, Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Life Care Planning Expert Witness's Role in Personal Injury Cases
December 1, 2025
This article explains what a life care planner does, how they serve as expert witnesses, and why their role is crucial in personal injury cases in the United States.
Why Earning Capacity Assessments Are Key for Fair Injury Claims
November 17, 2025
Learn why earning capacity assessments are vital for fair personal injury claims, how these vocational assessments are done, across the United States with OAS.
How Vocational Evaluations Affect Divorce and Spousal Support
November 3, 2025
Explore how vocational evaluations influence divorce, alimony, and spousal support. See how OAS experts deliver fair, court-ready assessments nationwide.
Vocational Evaluation in Personal Injury Cases
October 20, 2025
Learn how vocational evaluation documents work capacity, future earning losses, and job limits to support personal injury claims. See OAS Inc’s approach.
The Role of a Vocational Expert in Determining Spousal Support
October 6, 2025
In this article, we’ll explain what a vocational expert does, why their role is important in vocational evaluation for divorce & matrimonial cases. Call us now

CONTACT US