Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction

Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction

Case Name

Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction

Type of Injury

TRIMALLEOLAR ANKLE FRACTURE

Occupation

construction taper and spackler

Location

Queens, NY

Verdict

Directed verdict on liability. Reno 75%; SNH Construction 25% negligent. Settled during damages trial for $725,000.

Verdict Amount

$725,000.00

Case Details

VI/3-38 CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT – SCAFFOLD – APPORTIONMENT TRIAL – SETTLEMENT FOR TRIMALLEOLAR ANKLE FRACTURE

Furia v. Reno v. SNH Construction Verdict 3/87 Judge Sidney Leviss, Queens Supreme

VERDICT: Directed verdict on liability. Reno 75%; SNH Construction 25% negligent. Settled during damages trial for $725,000.

Pltf. Atty: Jeff Battan

Deft. Atty: Gregory J. Parisi of Hogan, Jones & Parisi, Manhattan, for Reno

Scott C. Watson of J.M. Furey & R.J. Furey, Hempstead, for SNH Construction

Facts: Pltf. was a 40-year-old construction taper and spackler at the time of the accident. He was employed by SNH Construction, a subcontractor for Reno, the general contractor. The work was being done on a private home. Pltf. was working on a scaffold when he fell 12 feet to the ground. Pltf. claimed that Defts. violated ?240 of the Labor Law. He contended that improper planks were used on the scaffold, allowing him to fall through.

A directed verdict was granted on the issue of liability. As there was no indemnification contract between the two Defts., the jury decided only the percentage contribution between them. At issue was which of the parties was responsible for placing the planks on the day in question.

Injuries: trimalleolar ankle fracture requiring several operations. Pltf. walks with a cane. He is unable to work at his old job. Pltf.’s expert economist estimated Pltf.’s lost earnings as a union taper/spackler at $848,000. No offer; demand: $750,000. Pltf. Experts: Dr. Robert Reiss, orth. surg., Huntington; Dr. Conrad Berenson, economist, Woodbury; Edmond Provder, rehabilitation specialist.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Deposition Insights: How OAS Helps Personal Injury Attorneys
March 2, 2026
Discover how OAS vocational evaluations and expert deposition support help personal injury attorneys strengthen cases and maximize settlement outcomes.
OAS Supports Injury Evaluations in Florida Car Accidents
February 16, 2026
OAS helps Florida car accident attorneys with injury evaluations, vocational assessments, and life care plans to ensure fair compensation for clients.
Maximizing Your Personal Injury Claim with OAS Experts
February 2, 2026
Learn how OAS expert services like vocational evaluations, life care plans, and demonstrative evidence help attorneys document damages in personal injury cases.
Why Demonstrative Evidence is Crucial in Catastrophic Injury Cases
January 19, 2026
Learn why demonstrative evidence is vital in catastrophic injury cases, helping juries understand complex facts, damages, and impact through clear visuals aids
What You Need to Know About Documenting Damages in Personal Injury Cases
January 5, 2026
This guide explains everything you need to know in clear and simple terms, including why documentation matters, what to collect, and how it helps with legal support.

CONTACT US