Blog Layout

Jerome Smith v. 333 Loft Associates

Jerome Smith v. 333 Loft Associates

Case Name

Jerome Smith v. 333 Loft Associates

Type of Injury

HERNIATED LUMBAR DISC

Occupation

painter

Location

Manhattan, NY

Verdict

Pltf.’s verdict on liability (5/1). Post-trial motions were denied. Case subsequently settled during the damages trial for $575,000.

Verdict Amount

$575,000.00

Case Details

XIII/43-8 LABOR LAW LADDER COLLAPSE HERNIATED LUMBAR DISC

Jerome Smith v. 333 Loft Associates 28822/91 4-day trial Verdict 3/25/96 Judge Leonard E. Yoswein, Kings Supreme

VERDICT: Pltf.’s verdict on liability (5/1). Post-trial motions were denied. Case subsequently settled during the damages trial for $575, 000. Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Albert Khafif of Rubenstein, Flatow & Rynecki, Brooklyn

Deft. Atty: William M. Boyle of Moore & Lafferty, Brooklyn

Facts: Pltf., a 52-year-old “off-the-books” painter, claimed that he was injured on 8/21/90 when he fell from a 6-foot-high ladder while painting a ceiling at 333 West 39th St. in Manhattan. Pltf. testified that the ladder did not have safety feet and there was no one with him to hold the ladder in place. Pltf. claimed that he was holding on to a water pipe to reach a portion of the ceiling when the ladder fell over. Pltf. contended that he was left hanging onto the pipe until he lost his grip and fell to the floor, landing on his heels. There were no witnesses to the accident. Pltf. contended that Deft. violated Labor Law ? 240(1) by failing to provide a safe workplace.

Deft. contended that the accident never happened, and claimed that Pltf.’s employer, who had died before the trial, had stated to Deft. that Pltf. was not working on a ladder on the day of the accident. Deft. also noted that Pltf. did not introduce any evidence indicating that the equipment was defective, and further noted that the equipment was supplied by Pltf.’s deceased employer.

Injuries: (settled for $575,000 during the damages trial) herniated disc at L5-S1 with sequestered fragments, requiring a laminotomy. Deft. would have argued that Pltf. suffered from pre-existing degenerative disc disease. Pltf.’s neurologist would have testified that although Pltf. had degenerative disc disease, the nerves in the affected area showed evidence of edema, indicating a fresh injury. Demonstrative evidence: charts of vocational rehabilitation testing; medical records; model of the spine; map of nerves in the area of the injury. Jury deliberation: 4 hours. Carrier: Aetna. Pltf. Experts: Dr. Irving Friedman, neurologist, Bronx; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Dr. Fred Scialabba, neurosurgeon, Glens Falls; Dr. Edmond Mantell, Ph.D., economist, Scarsdale . Deft. Experts: Dr. Steven Gilbert, neurologist, Brooklyn; Dr. Bruce Zablow, neuroradiologist, Manhattan; Dr. Fred Goldman, Ph.D., economist, Manhattan; Dr. Joel Teicher, orth. surg., Brooklyn.

RECENT POSTS

Medicaid Long Term Care Explained
25 Mar, 2024
Medicaid Long Term Care includes various programs that can help financially challenged seniors receive the care they need.
What Is Court Testimony
18 Mar, 2024
The question of what is court testimony can be confusing for those who aren’t legal professionals, primarily due to the fact witnesses fall into two distinct categories.
What Is Demonstrative Evidence In A Personal Injury Case
11 Mar, 2024
Demonstrative evidence can clarify the facts of the case and convince a jury of your claims.
Loss Of Earning Capacity
04 Mar, 2024
Loss of earning capacity can be awarded in a personal injury case and may help you recover financially after suffering an injury.
VA Disability Increase 2024
26 Feb, 2024
The VA disability increase 2024 is a good measure to fight inflation that may not be enough to account for the needs of all veterans.

CONTACT US

Share by: