Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh

Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh

Case Name

Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh

Type of Injury

NERVE INJURIES TO THE HAND AND WRIST

Location

Kings, NY

Verdict

Liability: Pltf. 35% negligent; Deft. 65% (6/0). The case subsequently settled for $475,000.

Verdict Amount

$$475,000

Case Details

XVI/16-8 RESTAURANT WINDOW PRE-EXISTING CRACKS IN THE GLASS NERVE INJURIES TO THE HAND AND WRIST

Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh 28350/95 3-day trial Verdict 4/30/98 Kings Supreme

Judge: Martin Schneier

Verdict: Liability: Pltf. 35% negligent; Deft. 65% (6/0). The case subsequently settled for $475,000. Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Harvey A. Herbert, Brooklyn, and Glenn Faegenburg of Edelstein & Faegenburg, Brooklyn

Deft. Atty: Derek E. Barrett of Gladstein & Isaac, Manhattan

Facts: Pltf., age 15 at the time, claimed that on 7/28/95 at about 9 PM, she leaned her hand against a restaurant window in Deft.’s building at 621 Flatbush Ave., Brooklyn when the glass broke. Pltf. contended that she was on her bicycle when a friend jumped onto it, causing her to lose her balance and lean her hand on the glass for support. She claimed that the window had a pre-existing crack and that it was not held in place properly. Witnesses, who had seen the window before the accident, testified that there were cracks in the glass. Pltf.’s engineer testified that Deft. violated the Administrative Building Code.

Deft. denied that there was a pre-existing crack, and argued that the glass broke because Pltf. pressed too hard on it. Deft.’s expert claimed that Pltf. used sufficient pressure in her fall to break the glass. The jury found that Pltf. was comparatively negligent for leaning on the glass.

Injuries: (not before the jury settled for $475,000) lacerations of nerves and tendons of the right (dominant) wrist. Pltf. underwent repair of the superficial and deep flexor tendons to the ulna and four fingers, including the flexor pollicis longus, flexor carpi radialis and ulnaris, and median and ulnar nerves. Her ulnar artery was ligated. Pltf. also underwent physical therapy, and claimed that she has significant loss of range of motion, weakness, and diminished sensation in the wrist. She contended that she has trouble writing. Pltf.’s vocational rehabilitation expert would have testified that she has a diminished earning capacity. Demonstrative evidence: medical illustrations; enlargement of hospital records. Offer: $65,000; demand prior to liability verdict: $750,000. Jury deliberation: 2 hours. Carrier: Axa Global Risks.

Pltf. Experts: Richard Berkenfeld, engineer, Great Neck. Pltf. would have called Dr. Michael Marrone, orth. surg., Yonkers; Dr. Joel Grad, orth. surg., Manhattan; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Deft. Experts: Stanley Fein, P.E., engineer, Plainview. Deft. would have called Dr. Martin A. Posner, hand surgeon, Manhattan; Dr. Jay Rosenblum, neurologist, Manhattan; Dr. Carl Schiller, plastic surgeon, Brooklyn; James Pascuiti, vocational rehabilitation, Springfield, New Jersey.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Deposition Insights: How OAS Helps Personal Injury Attorneys
March 2, 2026
Discover how OAS vocational evaluations and expert deposition support help personal injury attorneys strengthen cases and maximize settlement outcomes.
OAS Supports Injury Evaluations in Florida Car Accidents
February 16, 2026
OAS helps Florida car accident attorneys with injury evaluations, vocational assessments, and life care plans to ensure fair compensation for clients.
Maximizing Your Personal Injury Claim with OAS Experts
February 2, 2026
Learn how OAS expert services like vocational evaluations, life care plans, and demonstrative evidence help attorneys document damages in personal injury cases.
Why Demonstrative Evidence is Crucial in Catastrophic Injury Cases
January 19, 2026
Learn why demonstrative evidence is vital in catastrophic injury cases, helping juries understand complex facts, damages, and impact through clear visuals aids
What You Need to Know About Documenting Damages in Personal Injury Cases
January 5, 2026
This guide explains everything you need to know in clear and simple terms, including why documentation matters, what to collect, and how it helps with legal support.

CONTACT US