Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh

Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh

Case Name

Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh

Type of Injury

NERVE INJURIES TO THE HAND AND WRIST

Location

Kings, NY

Verdict

Liability: Pltf. 35% negligent; Deft. 65% (6/0). The case subsequently settled for $475,000.

Verdict Amount

$$475,000

Case Details

XVI/16-8 RESTAURANT WINDOW PRE-EXISTING CRACKS IN THE GLASS NERVE INJURIES TO THE HAND AND WRIST

Nadine Matthews v. Fenimore Plaza and Abe Betesh 28350/95 3-day trial Verdict 4/30/98 Kings Supreme

Judge: Martin Schneier

Verdict: Liability: Pltf. 35% negligent; Deft. 65% (6/0). The case subsequently settled for $475,000. Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Harvey A. Herbert, Brooklyn, and Glenn Faegenburg of Edelstein & Faegenburg, Brooklyn

Deft. Atty: Derek E. Barrett of Gladstein & Isaac, Manhattan

Facts: Pltf., age 15 at the time, claimed that on 7/28/95 at about 9 PM, she leaned her hand against a restaurant window in Deft.’s building at 621 Flatbush Ave., Brooklyn when the glass broke. Pltf. contended that she was on her bicycle when a friend jumped onto it, causing her to lose her balance and lean her hand on the glass for support. She claimed that the window had a pre-existing crack and that it was not held in place properly. Witnesses, who had seen the window before the accident, testified that there were cracks in the glass. Pltf.’s engineer testified that Deft. violated the Administrative Building Code.

Deft. denied that there was a pre-existing crack, and argued that the glass broke because Pltf. pressed too hard on it. Deft.’s expert claimed that Pltf. used sufficient pressure in her fall to break the glass. The jury found that Pltf. was comparatively negligent for leaning on the glass.

Injuries: (not before the jury settled for $475,000) lacerations of nerves and tendons of the right (dominant) wrist. Pltf. underwent repair of the superficial and deep flexor tendons to the ulna and four fingers, including the flexor pollicis longus, flexor carpi radialis and ulnaris, and median and ulnar nerves. Her ulnar artery was ligated. Pltf. also underwent physical therapy, and claimed that she has significant loss of range of motion, weakness, and diminished sensation in the wrist. She contended that she has trouble writing. Pltf.’s vocational rehabilitation expert would have testified that she has a diminished earning capacity. Demonstrative evidence: medical illustrations; enlargement of hospital records. Offer: $65,000; demand prior to liability verdict: $750,000. Jury deliberation: 2 hours. Carrier: Axa Global Risks.

Pltf. Experts: Richard Berkenfeld, engineer, Great Neck. Pltf. would have called Dr. Michael Marrone, orth. surg., Yonkers; Dr. Joel Grad, orth. surg., Manhattan; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Deft. Experts: Stanley Fein, P.E., engineer, Plainview. Deft. would have called Dr. Martin A. Posner, hand surgeon, Manhattan; Dr. Jay Rosenblum, neurologist, Manhattan; Dr. Carl Schiller, plastic surgeon, Brooklyn; James Pascuiti, vocational rehabilitation, Springfield, New Jersey.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.
Expert reviewing medical records
August 24, 2026
Learn how a medical needs assessment helps identify future care, daily living needs, and functional limits in serious injury cases. Discover what makes the process reliable.

CONTACT US