Peter Hill v. Roberta Liford

Peter Hill v. Roberta Liford

Case Name

Peter Hill v. Roberta Liford

Type of Injury

CAUSATION OF INJURIES WITH VEHICLE

Occupation

U.P.S Driver

Location

New York, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict (6/0)

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

XI/14-6 MOTOR VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN DEFENSE VERDICT ON CAUSATION OF INJURIES

Peter Hill v. Roberta Liford 16254/88 3-week trial Verdict 7/6/93 Judge Edward J. Greenfield, New York Supreme

VERDICT: Defense verdict (6/0). Jury: 2 male, 4 female.

Pltf. Atty: Jeffrey S. Lisabeth, Garden City

Deft. Atty: Robert J. Conway of Marshall, Conway & Wright, Manhattan

Facts: The accident occurred on 10/5/88. Pltf., a 29-year-old U. P.S. driver, testified that he parked his truck on the north side of East 88th St. between Fifth and Madison Aves. in order to make a delivery. Deft. parked her 1986 Mercedes Benz on the south side of the same street and turned off the engine. Pltf. contended that he loaded a handtruck and crossed the street, and that Deft. then turned on her car and it “bolted,” crossing the street and hitting Pltf.’s handtruck. The Mercedes was leased, and was subsequently returned to the dealer. It was never located.

Injuries: herniated disc at L4-5 with laminectomy; radiculopathy; testicular pain. Pltf. did not complain of any back injuries until 4 months after the accident. Pltf.’s experts contended that the herniated disc and laminectomy were causally related to the accident. The jury found that Deft. was liable, but found that Pltf.’s injuries were not causally connected to the accident. Offer: $300,000; demand: $750,000. Jury deliberation: 5 hours. Carriers: Seneca Insurance; State Farm. Pltf. Experts: Dr. Richard Radna, neurosurgeon, Manhattan; Dr. Michael Errico, orth. surg., Manhasset; Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Les Seplaki, economist, New Jersey. Deft. Experts: Dr. Isaac Cohen, orth. surg., Rockville Centre; Dr. James Sarno, neurosurgeon, Manhattan; Patricia Jenkins-Spady, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan; Frederick Goldman, economist, Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Vocational expert reviewing earning capacity records
November 2, 2026
Learn how vocational experts evaluate work history, medical limits, job options, and future income to measure a serious injury's financial impact.
Expert reviewing future medical needs in a catastrophic injury case
October 19, 2026
Learn how future care planning helps document medical needs, support damages, and clarify long-term care in catastrophic injury cases.
Attorney reviewing a plaintiff's future care report
October 5, 2026
Learn which reporting mistakes can weaken serious injury cases, from unsupported care needs to poor cost research, outdated records, and unclear expert opinions.
Attorney reviewing a serious injury case
September 21, 2026
Learn what attorneys should look for when choosing a future care expert, including credentials, clinical experience, report quality, and litigation readiness.
Injury case documents and medical records
September 7, 2026
Learn which actions can damage a personal injury case, from delayed treatment to poor documentation. Discover practical ways to protect evidence and support future damages.

CONTACT US