Blog Layout

Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA

Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA

Case Name

Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA

Type of Injury

LEAD POISONING

Occupation

student

Location

Kings, NY

Verdict

Defense verdict (5/1)

Verdict Amount

$0.00

Case Details

XV/40-14 LEAD POISONING EXPOSURE AT APARTMENT COMPLEX DEFENSE VERDICT

Steven Pamphile v. NYCHA 46070/93 3-week trial Verdict 2/13/98 Kings Supreme

Judge: Vasilios J. Arniotes

Verdict: Defense verdict (5/1). Jury: all female.

Post-trial motions were denied.

Pltf. Atty: Jeffrey Pittel, of counsel to E. Tanenhaus, P.C., Manhattan

Deft. Atty: Alan Kaminsky of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Manhattan

Facts: This action arose out of Pltf. s alleged exposure to lead at Deft. s apartment complex located on Ave. X in Brooklyn. Pltf. was an 8-year-old student at the time of the exposure beginning in June 1992. Pltf. moved from Haiti to Deft. s apartment complex in June 1992. He received a blood test as part of a school physical that showed a lead level of 43 mg/dl. The Department of Health inspected Deft. s apartment and found significant violations of unacceptable amounts of lead in the paint, and issued an order to abate the condition. Pltf. received chelation treatment for his lead poisoning. Subsequent apartment inspections by the Housing Authority and by Pltf. s own experts were inconclusive as to whether the level of lead in the paint was within allowable limits.

Injuries: brain damage; neurological injuries; diminished IQ; attention deficit disorder. Pltf. claimed that he is unable to perform tasks competently, and claimed that he has poor verbal abilities as a result of his exposure to lead. Deft. contended that Pltf. s lead poisoning occurred in Haiti. Deft. further argued that the lead level in the apartment was acceptable, and argued that the XRF machine used by the Department of Health was not calibrated properly, leading to inaccurate findings that resulted in the violation being issued.

Demonstrative evidence: enlargements of the XRF machine readings; school and hospital records. Jury deliberation: 3 hours. Specials: alleged lost earnings of $2,000,000.

Pltf. Experts: Dr. Robert Karp, pediatrician, Brooklyn; Dr. David Dorfman, neuropsychologist, Manhattan. Dr. William Berg, economist, Manhattan.

Deft. Experts: Dr. William Head, neurologist, Staten Island; Dr. Edmond Provder, vocational rehabilitation, Manhattan.

Disclaimer: The information on this website and blog is for general informational purposes only and is not professional advice. We make no guarantees of accuracy or completeness. We disclaim all liability for errors, omissions, or reliance on this content. Always consult a qualified professional for specific guidance.

RECENT POSTS

Choose OAS as Your Vocational Expert for Social Security Cases
February 3, 2025
Searching for VA expert for SSD cases. We will explore why choosing OAS as your vocational expert is the best decision for your Social Security Disability case.
How OAS Vocational Supports Veterans with Disability Evaluations? - oasinc
January 20, 2025
OAS Vocational provides specialized support for veterans, ensuring they receive fair & accurate evaluations for their disabilities.Contact oas vocational expert
Common Motorcycle Crashes and How to Avoid Them - OAS
January 6, 2025
Learn about the most common types of motorcycle crashes and practical tips to avoid them, helping you stay safe and prevent accidents on the road.
How is OAS Vocational Assessment helpful in Medical Malpractice Cases?
December 23, 2024
This guide will explore why OAS should be your go-to legal partner for medical malpractice cases and how they can help you navigate the complex legal system
Why Choose OAS For Wrongful Death? - Oasinc
December 2, 2024
Choose OAS For Wrongful Death. Our vocational expert guides you through the legal process and helps you seek justice & compensation for a wrongful death.

CONTACT US

Share by: